Saturday, 6 September 2014
(2) A simple symbolic shape of the normal mature well-functioning psyche
The grey is the background of unknowing: we have no grasp of reality beyond the reach of our senses. At the centre of the triangle is the animal-body unconscious, but with a radiating influence, supporting not only the outer centres but the three double-lines of interconnections from one to the other. The channels (shown in brown) are the basic developmental force generated from the unconscious centre that allows the other centres and triangle to take form and generate consciousness. Thus the supreme goddess Sunchild, as child of the rude, atavistic titans, takes her place in or around the unconscious center. The heart-symbol here does not represent her, but the overt urges and emotional workings of the individual's nature, thus Redbelly's. The head, of course, is the seat if the intellect, Bluehead's. The Chinese pictogram for 'earth' is the world-embracing center, where the individual has his (/her) impact on the physical and biological environment, and has to use his outer senses, limbs and so forth, to deal with the harsh - if sometimes very pleasant - impacts that the real world has on him - thus, Moonbeast's.
The integrity of the triangle enables the thrust of forces of the unconscious to be -as it were - steered and modified into a well-balanced consciousness. Aesthetics and imagination well-directed to enhancement of life beyond just that of the individual, play a big part in this. The unconscious centre is a seething cauldron of dream-like memory-generated and imaged ideas that the consciousness draws upon constantly. This inspirational function of the unconscious centre has to pass through the centre's outer filter (personified in by the earth-sun-goddess Sunchild) if it is not to disrupt the balance and unbroken interconnecting lines of the psychic triangle. If the steering through the holistic filtering does not take place , one might say it means that Sunchild has retreated to the emotional centre and cannot steer the course of the individual appropriately. She is no longer in the driver's seat, which sooner or later is taken over by the blindingly ruthless, more-or-less maniacal titans with their dream-machine. An example of this malfunction (fanaticism) will be presented as a break in the triangle (of sanity) in my next posting.
Friday, 5 September 2014
Introducing three posts: the first one dealing with the (Syai) ;psyche in terms of symbol, archetype and myth
How does one describe a sound mind as differing from an unsound? It may not have so much to do with "higher" abilities nor with ethical notions of emotional sensitivity and empathy, as with connectedness.
There are many images of the four deities of the Minor Quaternary in the Syai world. The above cartoon-like representation of the gods, sketched from Teress's memory, show Sunchild, Moonbeast, Redbelly and Bluehead as if before their mythical incorporation into the Syai Psyche. In the background are the ghostly images of the "terrible" titans, the progenitors and opponents of the gods. At the heart-center is Sunchild, represented as benevolent and in revolt against the violent brutal self-interest of the individual (and groups-of) whose empathy does not extend outside itself. However, she is also - in a deeper sense - the archetype of the unconscious and rooted in raw nature, being the daughter of the titans. Moonbeast, with his extendible rope-snake and sack, represents our body's active interface with the physical world; the outer senses and muscles with which we manipulate the world. Moonbeast was not born but initially created, like a robot, to serve the titans.
The other two deities are the children of Sunchild. Redbelly represents our visceral nature and is sometimes represented (as here) with two stomachs. She is the goddess of our motivational urges and emotions but not so much our more complex inmost feelings. In her excited state she devours creatures and regurgitates them in an altered state, morphed into an appearance closer to their real natures (from the ethical point of view).. Bluehead, the last-born, represents the "higher" brain or intellectual functions of the body: inquiring, calculating and reasoning (Mr Spock type).
The well-balanced mind may be represented (according to Syai psychology) as a centred triangle, Sunchild at the centre and the sub-centres of the other three at the angle-points. As far as the h(r)uman individual is concerned, the inner strength of each center varies, but their workings in interaction with each other determine the degree of well-being and sound functioning, more so than whether that person is intellectually bright or a sensitive tendency to strong passions. In my postings 2 &3, I go from the gods themselves to the way they may help us understand the positive norm of our nature and what happens when that norm becomes abnormal or pathological, as in the case of fanaticism, which the Syai would see as a form of insanity.
Friday, 29 August 2014
Intelligent life almost certain on other planets, but could their evolution be similar to Earth's?
From the dinosaurs to "rat-dogs" and Syai h(r)umans ...
Recent advances in knowledge of our evolutionary past establishes that a 10 km wide rock that fell on Earth millions of years ago led to the end of dinosaur dominance. On the face of it, it seems that had this not happened, we would not be here today. Does this undermine the plausibility of intelligent life on other planets that are physically similar to Earth, like the Syai planet?
Syai "experts" on evolution (according to Terres) don't deny that outer-space rocks fell and damaged large regions of evolving life, but none seem to have been as big and devastating as our Yucatan one. Smallish dinosaurs have survived into the Syai present: Terres calls two of the varieties "lizard-eels" and "swamp-dwelling billled-waders". There were larger ones even in comparatively recent times, but as with almost all of the very large mammals on Earth, "intelligent life" in its more primitive state wiped them out. It's also worth noting in support of my argument that Earth's giant plant-eaters were apparently on the wane around the time of the Yucatan collision.
On the Syai planet, mammals evolved and grew larger where and when conditions such as volcanic eruptions left regions almost empty of larger creatures. A species that had originally more connections to rodents rather than apes, and which Terres calls "sea-beavers", began to build fishing platforms along coast-lines out of gnawed branches and natural flotsam and jetsam. Occasionally these would detach and drift with wind and current. The sea-beavers and other small animals that happened to be on these rafts - if they were lucky - would be washed up on distant lands suitable for their habitation. Along with the other factors mentioned, this facilitated the eventual evolution of the rodent-like yet human-like form of intelligent life, as well as the large rodent-like yet dog-like animal that Terres named "rat-dogs".
Recent advances in knowledge of our evolutionary past establishes that a 10 km wide rock that fell on Earth millions of years ago led to the end of dinosaur dominance. On the face of it, it seems that had this not happened, we would not be here today. Does this undermine the plausibility of intelligent life on other planets that are physically similar to Earth, like the Syai planet?
Syai "experts" on evolution (according to Terres) don't deny that outer-space rocks fell and damaged large regions of evolving life, but none seem to have been as big and devastating as our Yucatan one. Smallish dinosaurs have survived into the Syai present: Terres calls two of the varieties "lizard-eels" and "swamp-dwelling billled-waders". There were larger ones even in comparatively recent times, but as with almost all of the very large mammals on Earth, "intelligent life" in its more primitive state wiped them out. It's also worth noting in support of my argument that Earth's giant plant-eaters were apparently on the wane around the time of the Yucatan collision.
On the Syai planet, mammals evolved and grew larger where and when conditions such as volcanic eruptions left regions almost empty of larger creatures. A species that had originally more connections to rodents rather than apes, and which Terres calls "sea-beavers", began to build fishing platforms along coast-lines out of gnawed branches and natural flotsam and jetsam. Occasionally these would detach and drift with wind and current. The sea-beavers and other small animals that happened to be on these rafts - if they were lucky - would be washed up on distant lands suitable for their habitation. Along with the other factors mentioned, this facilitated the eventual evolution of the rodent-like yet human-like form of intelligent life, as well as the large rodent-like yet dog-like animal that Terres named "rat-dogs".
Friday, 8 August 2014
Ownership of land ... and money
In the Syai Empire land is not privately owned; nor should it be in our world. What would be the difference here if we as equal citizens of commonwealth elected how land and other natural assets were to be managed? We would need a powerful agency, but as independent from politics as possible - an agency somewhat like the Dpt. of Conservation. Private households would lease their sections and have them renewed with a brief non-expensive inspection, say, every five years. Very little difference. For farms and the bigger more strategic holdings, the process would have to be more complex, but similar. A good farmer or land-holder would not need to be put through any radical change. But he/ she would need to accept that the requirements of protection for the ecology of the area would be more stringent. Perhaps the most radical change would be in inheritance and in passing on assets. In the Syai world, gifting is strictly limited, and inheritance doesn't exist. Again it's complex, but there's no god-given reason why a user of land and related assets should have the right to give over the use of it to another just because he or she is a descendent or associate of some kind. The would-be inheritor should have to compete with other interested parties, and put a convincing case for being allowed to take over the valuable asset and use it for the benefit of commonwealth as much as for his or her own benefit.
In a sense, money itself is not privately owned. You might say it should be owned (more as in the Syai world) by the commonwealth of land, sea, waterways, air and sunshine! Quantity of available money could be governed year by year by the seasons and yearly harvests. Money used to be anchored to gold, but in the Syai world it is anchored to nature and especially to what nature - in any given year - can produce without harming future productivity.
In our present world, money has come to be organized around the rich power-holders, who, by manipulating quantity, supply and to some degree circulation, are able to exploit the natural and human environment as suits them. They have achieved a growing domination over social change and have been able to draw to themselves a growing power to accumulate and maintain great "fortresses" of valuable assets and serviceable wealth around dynastic families (thus holding back real democratic change). They also have growing decision-making powers over the directions to be taken by science and technology.
Syai money loses value with passage of time - how that works cannot be briefly explained here. 'Tickets' of small value take the place of petty cash. On each ticket is the picture above (or something like it), of the mysterious Dark Flower of Syai legend, linking the mind-magic of money with the mysteries of nature.
Monday, 4 August 2014
The four 'heads' heading us toward extinction
Civilization expands not only in space ("uncontrolled' population growth), but in its power to build on and change its environment to suit the agendas of those seeking to make life better for themselves and others and maybe for some fellow-creatures.
The founders of Syai, aware of the potential dangers to nature and society of so-called progress, determined from the start that civilization's expansion and progress would never be allowed to be achieved at permanent loss to ecological diversity and damage to the 'commonwealth' of the planet's biosphere. To follow the Syai example, not only would many of our practices have to change, but to sustain the change would take a great deal of soul-searching. We can no longer dismiss the task as too hard on our human natures, with the cynical view that the only thing mankind ever learns from history is that mankind never learns from history.
I am at the stage of translating (with Terres's help) the part of the Syai myth-story where what I have just been outlining becomes particularly relevant. It deals mythologically with what brought death into the world on a grand scale. Of course we need to die, but not prematurely as individuals, nor prematurely as a species. Nor should be be, as individuals or as groups, enjoying long and luxurious lives with the consequence that many 'outsiders' are condemned to poor lives and premature deaths. It could be said that the Syai equivalent of the four horses are the four heads of the creature of Syai mythology that destroyed the Lesser Wheel of Creation. Terres calls that creature "the zombie-dragon".
The Story
Rescuing their child from a storm, the child's parents, "pre-humans", disobeyed orders, leaving it too late to reach their hide-away cave. The fiercest of the Titans, the Lady of Light, appeared in a flash of lighting before them, and questioned them. She found out they had not been naturally born as divine children of the Goddess Sunchild, but had been made by the gods on a magical machine - the Lesser Wheel of Creation. The titanic lady, in a rage, sent down one of her own creations on the Greater Wheel to smash up the Lesser that the gods had constructed by stealing the 'blue-print' of the Greater. That ended all avenues of immortality to the pre-humans, and introduced the destructive forces that not only cause individuals to die but keep all of mankind-to-come under a permanent cloud of threatened self-extinction.
The negative, collectively self-defeating nature of mankind is symbolized in the four heads of the Zombie-dragon. Translated (as best Terres was able), these are:
The founders of Syai, aware of the potential dangers to nature and society of so-called progress, determined from the start that civilization's expansion and progress would never be allowed to be achieved at permanent loss to ecological diversity and damage to the 'commonwealth' of the planet's biosphere. To follow the Syai example, not only would many of our practices have to change, but to sustain the change would take a great deal of soul-searching. We can no longer dismiss the task as too hard on our human natures, with the cynical view that the only thing mankind ever learns from history is that mankind never learns from history.
I am at the stage of translating (with Terres's help) the part of the Syai myth-story where what I have just been outlining becomes particularly relevant. It deals mythologically with what brought death into the world on a grand scale. Of course we need to die, but not prematurely as individuals, nor prematurely as a species. Nor should be be, as individuals or as groups, enjoying long and luxurious lives with the consequence that many 'outsiders' are condemned to poor lives and premature deaths. It could be said that the Syai equivalent of the four horses are the four heads of the creature of Syai mythology that destroyed the Lesser Wheel of Creation. Terres calls that creature "the zombie-dragon".
The Story
Rescuing their child from a storm, the child's parents, "pre-humans", disobeyed orders, leaving it too late to reach their hide-away cave. The fiercest of the Titans, the Lady of Light, appeared in a flash of lighting before them, and questioned them. She found out they had not been naturally born as divine children of the Goddess Sunchild, but had been made by the gods on a magical machine - the Lesser Wheel of Creation. The titanic lady, in a rage, sent down one of her own creations on the Greater Wheel to smash up the Lesser that the gods had constructed by stealing the 'blue-print' of the Greater. That ended all avenues of immortality to the pre-humans, and introduced the destructive forces that not only cause individuals to die but keep all of mankind-to-come under a permanent cloud of threatened self-extinction.
The negative, collectively self-defeating nature of mankind is symbolized in the four heads of the Zombie-dragon. Translated (as best Terres was able), these are:
- corruption
- greed
- trivia-fixation (/apathy)
- fanaticism
Monday, 28 July 2014
Change, fashion and mass production
The picture here (by Terres) is merely a suggestion of the kind of applique that a Syai individual might attach to his or her standard mass-produced robe. Everyone has their own design, and some like this one might use the insect-emblem of the Syai Empire, an insect most similar to our dragonfly.
"Fashion" and its rapid changes and the way it is exploited is part of our civilization's ills. We on Earth are in a period where everything is moving too fast! That includes the pace of economic, technological and electronic change, while some "human" changes are not happening fast enough. It is not so much the lagging-behind old but the young that we should worry about. Children weren't designed to grow up in a whirling current of change, pushed from outside themselves to compete and keep up or outstrip "the Joneses" children.
Everyone wants to express their individuality and uniqueness, even if it is very much within a tight group or culture. But they don't necessarily want to do it through being fashionable or famous. One does not need to be successful. It often seems that parents, teachers and students are desperate for success! The simple truth, however, is that success and achievement (within the present socio-economic, political and educational system) is weightedly relative. By that I mean, that the person striving for success only reaches that state at the disadvantage and weighty mass of the many other persons who do not reach any such state, not matter how hard they strive. G&S in light opera says: "When everybody's somebody, nobody's anybody." For the maximization of general happiness, I would propose that first of all we all just work on finding ourselves as a "somebody" according to our own lights
How Syai society looks at all this has something to do with how the Syai people dress. 'Fancy fashion' is shown in the applique that is the size of one's hand sewn on the front of the mass-produced robe (sized for the individual). One has a robe for the wind and cold, and apart from that one wears close-fitting comfortable stretchy clothes to suit various purposes in various locations.
Almost everything in the Syai civilization is mass-produced, excluding what nature produces from soil, water and sunshine. The caravan-cottage that every adult has is the same design for everyone, with its components mass-produced and put together the same way. This has enormous benefits in eliminating waste and inefficiency caused by duplication of effort and constant change to keep up with fashion and fancy demands. Nevertheless, it means that change in the Syai world is very slow. Innovation is not hastened by war. But if research indicates that a change would be beneficial to all, a big change and adjustment can happen, expensive though it might be in energies and resources to bring it about. Engines that run on liquid fuel have a long-term life in the Syai world, because it is hard to beat the convenience of that kind of fuel. Our Earth society may have appeared to change that kind of motor vehicle frequently, but really it is mostly fashion changes and very gradual slight improvements in engine efficiency. The internal combustion engine still pollutes our environment and causes wars over "black gold".
Thursday, 24 July 2014
The Syai "culturally modified" version of The Lord's Prayer.
Overshadowing the Maori language are the anglo-european language and culture. Maori was better than the English language for description and function in Aotea NZ before the country became drastically changed by anglo-european mass-settlement (added to now by settlers from Asian cultures). To survive, a language's culture must assume dominance and success. It could well be that a fictional culture that has the luxury of assuming success, and has a well-defined separate purpose, is in a better position to last than some of the "real" languages and cultures that are today so submerged in the globally prevailing languages and cultures.
Placing Syai alongside Maori would be a false comparison, but there's a point to emphasise about the mention of both together. Any language, real or imaginary, derives its authenticity and vigour from the culture it belongs to. If you were able to go to Feishoafeis or any other planet with a human-like civilization, you would hardly be likely to find anything that much resembled our Western and Middle-Eastern culture of Christendom and its related God-religions. Some similarities, perhaps, would be found in basic moral precepts, but the claim that Christianity is a universally valid bulwark of good social behaviour is bogus, well disproved by history. Christianity and related religions "inform" our culture and language because of their long traditional monopoly of symbol and myth. There is no high moral ground for one established religion over another. Everything depends on how it is interpreted and modified through historic changes, and subsequently practised by its adherents.
A direct translation of The Lord's Prayer, therefore, would make little sense to the Syai world of listeners or readers. What I present here is The Lord's Prayer modified to give it affinity with the Syai culture. It then has correspondence while at the same time expressing something very different at its spiritual foundation. It is a little like the Chinese on being pressed to convert to Christianity having no suitable word in their language for 'God'. You may have the material and missionary power to impose a faith-system that suits you, but it only ends up damaging the psyches of those you impose it on.
To make the point and to allow visitors to this blog to view a page of 'native' Syai writing, I have pictured such a page at the top of this blog, and will now translate this "Lord's Prayer" as it would be appreciated in the Syai world of myth-religious ceremony and seasonal festivals:
" Divine First, sacred beginning of everything.
Let-be that the sign of the divine One shows ever in our skies.
Let-be that the holy grand-children of the divine One bless the lives of us all, and let-be that our small planet-world simulates the great twilight-land of The Sacred Mountain.
Let-not-be that there would be destitution and hunger; but let-be that we, children of the Great Quaternary, always give and receive the bounty of the world with generosity and forgiveness.
Being-as-thankful we should be, that the the Great Quaternary sacrificed easy return to Its sacred homeland for-to make a worldly home in our bodies."
Be-blessed
Monday, 21 July 2014
The price that has to be paid for the re-construction of society to be just and fair.
I don't know where I got this picture from, but one might imagine it as of First Empress Fahraa, founder of the Syai movement established over most regions of the planet Feishoafeis (formerly known as Okraalom). The man behind her in the shadow might be her general, the commander of the forces that had to use minimal violence to impose the New Order that created the just society and banished war forever. (Fahraa herself was very distressed that any military action at all had to be used.)
Why would a 'Utopia' need a government and a legal system - let alone a military general - to start with? Wouldn\t a 'utopia' be just full of happy well-behaved people? Not what you might call a real utopia that takes account of evolution and our basic animal nature. Utopian realism is only an aspiration of balance: a lessening of fateful blows whether by natural or h(r)uman antagonists; coupled with fair governance based on experience and reason. It offers no cure for existential angst - distress such as in facing old age and death.
The leaders in wealth, power and influence in our Earth-societies have managed to maintain, even increase, influence and control over the ordinary citizen under their various jurisdictions. The resources and energies of those they are supposed to protect are used in their jockeying for power between themselves, dragging the ordinary citizenry into their quarrels and providing what they take to be justification for military power and expansion. The power-elite protect ownership rights and freedoms of individuals and groups, but in such a way that genuine justice is not served; the 'fruits' of the protective legal and financial system are progressively captured by a smaller and smaller percentage of the population. How does this happen? Not because the rising super-wealthy are more ambitious, industrious and smart than the rest of us. Many of them, of course, are indeed well-educated in working their way through the arcane, tortuous maze of the global financial system. The rest of aspiring citizens must struggle against the inherent advantages of the better-off few at the top.
What makes the basic injustice or out present system happen, is that most of the very rich and super-rich are served by opinion-leaders and the media to uphold a system that has two 'mechanisms' to put, and keep, them there, well on-top. Secrecy is one of these, often misguidedly defended under the guise of protection of privacy. Secrecy drags us into leadership quarrels between groups and nations that are constantly eyeing what resources are left out there in the wider world. The other 'mechanism' is basically the right that the legal systems in general gives to semi-monopolizing giant corporations to behave as if they were individuals, with the rights that individuals normally have, or should have, to satisfy a genuine flesh-and-blood individual's modest needs. But the corporate individual does not have comparative modest needs. They have gigantic, voracious needs and voracious cravings to try to satisfy an ever-expanding catalogue of 'needs' dictated to them by their stake-holders and overpaid chiefs, with their demands to exploit for maximum profit a 'consumerist' market driven by viciously competitive and misleading advertising.
To be as personally private as you please when you please is freely granted under the Syai system as described by Terres. But, beyond that, there is no transactional and public-affecting secrecy. You have the right to know all about the other person or group, and they have the right to know all about you, apart from the really important aspect of privacy just mentioned. That is the pre-requisite of a genuine justice system. If the "less important" privacy-come-secrecy is not sacrificed to justice, the system will evolve toward what we presently have on Earth. It will become more and more depressingly unjust, not just to ourselves but to our descendants and all persons and fellow-creatures that do and will in the near future inhabit this planet.
(This is probably my last blog for a while: Terres and I are at a fairly crucial stage in the study of the Syai language and the adjustment of it for presentation as a viable language for this planet.)
Thursday, 10 July 2014
How Syai links ethics to how a society of well-being and sustainability can be maintained.
A happiness ethic requires a clean, pleasant natural environment (see picture).
Is there an ethical standard to all our variety of belief about what makes an action right or wrong (morally speaking)? The founder of Syai (according to Terres, our visitor to the Syai world) formulated such a standard in a line of only a dozen symbols. Something like that line is set out here as best remembered:
Is there an ethical standard to all our variety of belief about what makes an action right or wrong (morally speaking)? The founder of Syai (according to Terres, our visitor to the Syai world) formulated such a standard in a line of only a dozen symbols. Something like that line is set out here as best remembered:
I=g --< K(t.S)=G.
Of course this won't mean anything without explanation. The symbol '--<', for instance, is only my made-up symbol for "if-and-only-if". What Fahraa, the founder, pointed out was that 'Good', writ large, was not to be derived from the same word with a missing 'o'. We are lost if we try to relate right action with our particular culture, religion of collective gut-feelings. We then start exchanging blows about what's good, what's bad, what's right and what's wrong. The law of the land guides us, but it can be an ass, as can some of the guidance given by the moral precepts that come from ancient traditions and individuals who have set themselves up as 'God's interpreters'.
According to the Syai, the 'Good' which reliably guides our actions can only be established by what they call "The Naturalistic Axion". It states that we, as a species, have the power to destroy our world and ourselves. Naturally, at the same time, we have within us the instinctual desire to continue to survive (as a species) for as long as the changing universe can allow us to, although we can subvert that desire by giving priority to other, more immediate ones. Furthermore, survival on that scale is only possible if we flourish. Furthermore, the condition of our flourishing is a care for ecological balances with consideration for the species we share the planet with. Given the appeal and rationality of this axiomatic approach, we can interpret the symbols as follows: I = the individual as active agent; g = what he needs (ethically) to consider good; K = our state of collective knowledge based on everything that objective observation and the scientific method can reveal to us; S = 'Survival' but as a function of 't', time, which must be taken into account as we can make good predictions based on present knowledge but can only speculate as to the more long-term future on what it will take for us to survive. All these considerations a process that add up to the best notion possible of what is the good that we must strive for - 'G', the greater good for all. Because of the 't' factor, there is a degree of uncertainty inevitable about 'G'. Unfortunately, we cannot invent a time machine to bring persons back from the far distant future, to test whether the ethical guidance that our formula gives us is absolutely reliable. But there are no absolutes in real life.
Picture by Severin, 6 y.o.
Thursday, 3 July 2014
What's good and what's bad about religion.
The illustration is a rough impression of a Syai temple-theatre. The material world is the lower hemisphere, the spiritual is the invisible upper. On the far side is a stage and open-air tiered seating for 'sacred' dramas. Titans, gods and spirits perform on the flat roof, sometimes descending to the stage.
A human-like culture of a planet like Earth would hardly have a religion very similar to our main ones. (Read 'The Sparrow' and 'Children of God'.) Giordano Bruno was executed for saying something similar. The Syai religion is really a mythological story performing the task of teaching basic ethics and psychological understandings. The object of the story is to guide us along the survival-path of empathy, conflict-solving and co-operation despite differences; but also to raise awareness of the potency of the dark side of our natures. The myth with its mysterious 'Prime Mover', its power-hungry egotistical titans and the creative, struggling gods that revolted against them - in the final analysis - is simply a 'picturing' of archetypal personifications that in the end reside in our individual psyches.
No Syai person would fall to believing that these spirit-entities and the sacred mountain with its surrounding four spirit-lands are 'real'. Nevertheless the story has power just because it is not a stagnated faith in some past revelation by a pretender to a direct line to God. The painful past can be moved by spirit-mind into a better present, and that betterment can be maintained, improved upon with universal enhancement of our lives despite universal mortality. Suffering need not be so exaggerated as we find it in a world like ours. So it is that what's right about Religion is so well summed up in this paragraph written by Anthony de Mello:
A religious belief is not a statement about Reality, but a hint, a clue, about something that is a mystery, beyond the grasp of human thought. In short, a religious belief is just a finger pointing to the moon. Some religious people never get beyond the study of the finger. Others are engaged in sucking it. Others yet use the finger to gouge their eyes out. These are the bigots whom religion has made blind. Rare indeed is the religionist who is sufficiently detached from the finger to see what it is indicating - these are those who, having gone beyond belief, are taken for blasphemers.
A human-like culture of a planet like Earth would hardly have a religion very similar to our main ones. (Read 'The Sparrow' and 'Children of God'.) Giordano Bruno was executed for saying something similar. The Syai religion is really a mythological story performing the task of teaching basic ethics and psychological understandings. The object of the story is to guide us along the survival-path of empathy, conflict-solving and co-operation despite differences; but also to raise awareness of the potency of the dark side of our natures. The myth with its mysterious 'Prime Mover', its power-hungry egotistical titans and the creative, struggling gods that revolted against them - in the final analysis - is simply a 'picturing' of archetypal personifications that in the end reside in our individual psyches.
No Syai person would fall to believing that these spirit-entities and the sacred mountain with its surrounding four spirit-lands are 'real'. Nevertheless the story has power just because it is not a stagnated faith in some past revelation by a pretender to a direct line to God. The painful past can be moved by spirit-mind into a better present, and that betterment can be maintained, improved upon with universal enhancement of our lives despite universal mortality. Suffering need not be so exaggerated as we find it in a world like ours. So it is that what's right about Religion is so well summed up in this paragraph written by Anthony de Mello:
A religious belief is not a statement about Reality, but a hint, a clue, about something that is a mystery, beyond the grasp of human thought. In short, a religious belief is just a finger pointing to the moon. Some religious people never get beyond the study of the finger. Others are engaged in sucking it. Others yet use the finger to gouge their eyes out. These are the bigots whom religion has made blind. Rare indeed is the religionist who is sufficiently detached from the finger to see what it is indicating - these are those who, having gone beyond belief, are taken for blasphemers.
Friday, 27 June 2014
Background to celebrations of Winter Solstace
Above (picture) is the sun imprisoned in darkness, beginning to escape and emerge into the world's sky where it can renew heat and light. Below is an imaginative picture of the Syai titans, who in the spiritual world represent light and darkness. In Syai mythology, the sun was torn out of the breast of the Titan Lady of Light (the 'light' of the Big Bang, one might imagine) to escape and give light to our worlds. The Lady was left with a hole in her breast, where the sun was imprisoned as her breast-heart. (She still has a smaller on in her tail.) Similarly to the ancient Greek mythology, the Syai titans are more-or-less parents of the Syai gods. The Syai story of creation has much influence in Syai culture and in the celebration of seasonal festivals.
The above is from Chapter 10 of the Syai 'Holy" Book, which Terres is translating from the Syai language in such a way that it demonstrates to anyone keen to learn the language how it works. He therefore uses a reasonably literal translation. At present Terres (that's 'me') is revising this from-memory Syai source.
Christianity (and others)
The seminal beliefs of Christians appear to have been grafted on to the myth-religions of the ancient world of the Middle Eastern 'crossroads' of trade and culture. All historic evidence points to it: a Divine Child miraculously born; Mithra - known as "The Unconquered Sun" - his birthday on the 25 December. The Babylonian goddess Astarte, "Queen of Heaven" gave birth to a divine child, and so on. The Child of Light has many different names according to cultural variants: Horus, Osiris, Helios, Dionysus, Aeon ...
For Christianity, Jesus was chosen, it seems, as a myth/legend version of a remarkable man of whom there's some conflicting evidence and reports about in history, but who really was more a 'man' of mystery, placed alongside the above-mentioned Divine Child gods. That spriit-person who supposedly walked the Earth was made a figure of light sent be a god of gods. Although he was not of the 'Sun' he nevertheless follows the symbolic pattern of the 'Sun' in birth and resurrection. He was then connected for his enhancement to the holy writ tradition of the Hebrews as a kind of Pope-Francis re-interpretor of the Old Testament.
Thursday, 19 June 2014
Features of the Syai language in relation to the 'alien' civilization but as possible 'Earth' language.
There's no reason to ignore the proven likelihood that other civilizations exist on other planets. The proof is there - not in any absolute sense, but in combining physics and cosmology with math. probability-analysis. Such a civilization as is 'imagined' under the name 'Syai', must be a development on a planet similar to ours if it is to have any real relevance to our human condition. It must have more meaning to us than just escapist entertainment. That Syai h(r)umans have a culture and language of their own is vital for this "thought-experiment".
Terres can use English to describe Syai culture, but the language is the window to the full envisaging and appreciation of it.
The twelve key consonants are the cornerstone of the building of Syai vocabulary. Each letter points to a picture-of-sorts as a hint of generalized meaning (but not a precise indication of connotation). With study of how the language expands from that, one can end up with any utterance (in ordinary conversation) able to be spoken and written down with ease. Spelling is phonetic and systematic and the grammar also follows regular patterns almost entirely. The grammar has important differences from English, but is not very different from most of the European and related languages. However, Syai grammar is expressive in itself of Syai culture and mythology to the extent that even the way each verbal root can be varied in meaning and application is pattern-integrated with the Syai pantheon.
A sentence that can be written and spoken in Syai might be any picked out of a hat, but the ordinary typewriter just makes it look incomprehensible, as it would also be to any native Syai. I can write it correctly on my laptop with the Syai font. If you dont have that font, a sentence translated into Syai like "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog." looks like this:
. \srr |subjaf cyq uusad yct||vc reim |sra wdjaf dpaim|tu.
Terres can use English to describe Syai culture, but the language is the window to the full envisaging and appreciation of it.
The twelve key consonants are the cornerstone of the building of Syai vocabulary. Each letter points to a picture-of-sorts as a hint of generalized meaning (but not a precise indication of connotation). With study of how the language expands from that, one can end up with any utterance (in ordinary conversation) able to be spoken and written down with ease. Spelling is phonetic and systematic and the grammar also follows regular patterns almost entirely. The grammar has important differences from English, but is not very different from most of the European and related languages. However, Syai grammar is expressive in itself of Syai culture and mythology to the extent that even the way each verbal root can be varied in meaning and application is pattern-integrated with the Syai pantheon.
A sentence that can be written and spoken in Syai might be any picked out of a hat, but the ordinary typewriter just makes it look incomprehensible, as it would also be to any native Syai. I can write it correctly on my laptop with the Syai font. If you dont have that font, a sentence translated into Syai like "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog." looks like this:
. \srr |subjaf cyq uusad yct||vc reim |sra wdjaf dpaim|tu.
Saturday, 14 June 2014
Changes needed for a better 'Earth' economy
[Picture by courtesy of five-year-old grandson]
The Capitalist genie is out of the bottle; everyone and everything of natural value serving the almighty dollar instead of the other way round. And what is the (US)dollar based on? Nothing but tenuous trust! In contrast, the Syai unit of money - the "pawneis" is based on food, or rather, the seasonal production and availability of essential foodstuffs.
Most trade has to be done in the USdollar, or at least in close association with it. Other currencies are unreliable because they can be manipulated by means of the US dollar; for example by altering terms of trade in favor of the "big guys" - the US government and banks and indirectly most of the transnational companies. This manipulation can be done by printing money or leaning on weaker national economies to do deals that in the longer term enrich the "(young-and-)old-boy-network" of the super-rich in the interrelated circles of the US government and the six main banking houses (some of the six now amalgamated). Other super-rich may not live in the US but they tend to be closely linked to fortunes of the US monetary and power-elite. The whole of this 1-5% of Earth\s population are increasingly setting the agenda for most if not all national economies by having the power of large-scale investment, along with dominating the main determinants of culture through the media. Large-scale investment by the rich internationalists tends to absorb or knock out small-scale investment by the nationals of the smaller economies and marginalize the ordinary worker or middle-class citizen of those smaller economies. Hence, poverty in "advanced" countries.
A country prospers by preserving wilderness and giving its citizens sound infrastructure. Development financed by outside investment with out-flow of profits and a need to borrow from external rich international financiers does not make for sound local economies or a good living environment. The citizens within a country need to pay taxes and invest. For that they need jobs that allow them to save resources. Taxes go toward good-for-all infrastructure and the savings go into local investment providing capital for innovators and problem-solvers who live in the country and know it best. More internal jobs are thus created and expectations of a reasonable wage even for the less well trained and educated are fulfilled. Great to be a privileged, famed or supe-rskilled worker, but there's never any shortage of useful work if the money is spread evenly enough for it to be paid for. Money from outside from those that have too much? The old saying: "If you need to dine with the devil, take a long spoon with you!"
The Capitalist genie is out of the bottle; everyone and everything of natural value serving the almighty dollar instead of the other way round. And what is the (US)dollar based on? Nothing but tenuous trust! In contrast, the Syai unit of money - the "pawneis" is based on food, or rather, the seasonal production and availability of essential foodstuffs.
Most trade has to be done in the USdollar, or at least in close association with it. Other currencies are unreliable because they can be manipulated by means of the US dollar; for example by altering terms of trade in favor of the "big guys" - the US government and banks and indirectly most of the transnational companies. This manipulation can be done by printing money or leaning on weaker national economies to do deals that in the longer term enrich the "(young-and-)old-boy-network" of the super-rich in the interrelated circles of the US government and the six main banking houses (some of the six now amalgamated). Other super-rich may not live in the US but they tend to be closely linked to fortunes of the US monetary and power-elite. The whole of this 1-5% of Earth\s population are increasingly setting the agenda for most if not all national economies by having the power of large-scale investment, along with dominating the main determinants of culture through the media. Large-scale investment by the rich internationalists tends to absorb or knock out small-scale investment by the nationals of the smaller economies and marginalize the ordinary worker or middle-class citizen of those smaller economies. Hence, poverty in "advanced" countries.
A country prospers by preserving wilderness and giving its citizens sound infrastructure. Development financed by outside investment with out-flow of profits and a need to borrow from external rich international financiers does not make for sound local economies or a good living environment. The citizens within a country need to pay taxes and invest. For that they need jobs that allow them to save resources. Taxes go toward good-for-all infrastructure and the savings go into local investment providing capital for innovators and problem-solvers who live in the country and know it best. More internal jobs are thus created and expectations of a reasonable wage even for the less well trained and educated are fulfilled. Great to be a privileged, famed or supe-rskilled worker, but there's never any shortage of useful work if the money is spread evenly enough for it to be paid for. Money from outside from those that have too much? The old saying: "If you need to dine with the devil, take a long spoon with you!"
Monday, 2 June 2014
Principles of Social Reconstruction (Syai 'Affirmation 3)
Certain emotions (or motivations) tend to cause friction and suffering, but they arise naturally in us as in other socially interactive animals. One of these emotions is ENVY. Accepting and incorporating it at the same time as disarming it as one of the preoccupations of the Syai Founder's mind. The first six affirmations for social reconstruction and sustainability are in the orange frame above, but I write No.3 here as it is the subject of present attention, so needs to be easily read:
3. Those who are secure in a state of well-being, enjoying freedom and privileges beyond the capacities of the majority to enjoy, must in future find justification in undertaking duties that contribute to the benefit of alll. Otherwise, envy becomes justifiable. The aim is to create social conditions in which envy - albeit part of our emotional natures - cannot be justified. (Slightly changed in translation appropriately for the state we are in on this planet at present.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















